˷ͧƻ

Home
CALENDARS Project
Methodology

Autoethnography as a research method

In March 2020 most of the world went into lockdown as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenging times lay ahead for everyone, including the research community.

hiking in mountains
How can we use our personal experiences doing research? In CALENDARS we turned to autoethnography when the world went into lock- down in March
Photo:
Sissel Aasheim

Main content

With no way to collaborate with research participants to garner seasonal insights, we asked ourselves how can we do ethnographic research under lock-down? A decision was made to reflect on our own experiences and observations by regularly writing a seasonal diary. And so our journey of engagement with autoethnography began; opposite seasonal insights experienced at opposite ends of the world.

What is autoethnographyand how can it add value toresearch into seasonal representations? As aresearch method, autoethnography emphasisespersonal experience andplacesreflection in the context of the cultural framework within which the research is conducted(Ellis, Adams, & Bochner, 2011; Wall, 2008).Contrary to traditional methodological approaches and perceptions, autoethnography encourages the researcher to incorporate her or his own positionality and subjective experience(Adams, Jones, & Ellis, 2015; Stahlke Wall, 2018). The methodological aim is no longer to present research findings detached from personal experiences but to use these experiences toget to the culture being researched(Pelias, 2003),thus,the method is partautoor self and partethnoor culture (Ellis 2004).

Having becomecut off from most of our daily routines like goingto theoffice, doingsports,takingkids to schoolorkindergarten and even socializing with friends and family, the team experienced an intensified notion ofseasonal representations by turning to autoethnography. Our senses and attention sharpened and madeusaware of howremarkable andnoteworthytheseasonal changestakingplace around us as part ofthe rhythms of ourlives. This was emphasiseddue to the fact thatthe majority ofcultural seasonal markers(e.g., Easter celebration, festivals,school holidays)passedby almost without noticing. The days became void of social and cultural experiences and so what at times felt like a reliving of the same day over and over again became a unique opportunity for acute environmental observation and personal reflection based on the cultural context in which the CALENDARS researchers are based.

Three decadesago,when autoethnography wasin its infancy, it was already clear to Ellis(1991)that any research questions asked as a result of personal experience would lead to culturally relevant answers.Autoethnographymakes itpossible forour own experience to guidethe researchwe conduct. For that,trustinourpersonalobservationsand experiences and their valueand our ability to convey theseis fundamental.The value of autoethnography holdstrue forbothsociological inquiryas well asfor ecological and seasonal inquiry: our experience as members of the human society with the seasonal influence on our social as well as physical environment.

The contemporary western and scientific view is that seasons are divided into distinct periods throughout the year: spring, summer, autumn, winter.Fixed dates have been set to mark the beginnings and ends oftheseperiods,yet they fail to do justice to the nuanced and micro-level observations and experiences ‘on the ground’.Using autoethnography as part of a suit of ethnographic ‘tools’ enables a more contextualised and meaningful way of understanding how people live by and symbolise seasons, also what they value about seasons and how theseexperiences relate to the wider cultural setting in which the seasons follow their rhythms. This is because autoethnography comes from a place of experience (i.e., the place-based researcher experiences the same seasonal phenomena), even though the interpretation and the cultural framing of the experience may be different.

Hence, the intention of reflecting on our own seasonal experiences andexpanding our ethnographic research approach to includeautoethnographycomes from ourpersonalexperienceof seasonsoftentimes being out of sync withwider society’s seasonal representations(spring, summer, autumn,andwinter). Through our own experience in ‘being out there’, whether it is going for a stroll in the forest, catching waves or just feeling the elements, there is, at times, a mismatch between what the calendar says andour ownexperience on the ground as much as there is a scale discrepancy. On a personal scale, the seasonal experience is nuanced and intimate:we see and hear seasonalmarkers,yet theseare not necessarily documented by othersand often they are also not represented as part ofculturaland/orscientificseasonal experience.

References:

Adams, T. E., Jones, S. H., & Ellis, C. (2015).Autoethnography. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, C. (1991). Sociological Introspection and Emotional Experience.Symbolic Interaction, 14(1), 23-50. doi:10.1525/si.1991.14.1.23
Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA:AltaMiraPres.Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview.Historical Social Research /HistorischeSozialforschung, 36(4 (138)), 273-290.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (1996).Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing(Vol. 1): Rowman Altamira.
Pelias, R. J. (2003). The Academic Tourist: An Autoethnography.Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 369-373. doi:10.1177/1077800403009003003
Stahlke Wall, S. (2018). Reflection/Commentary on a Past Article: “Easier Said Than Done: Writing an Autoethnography”:International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1),doi:10.1177/1609406918788249
Wall, S. (2008). Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38-53. doi:10.1177/160940690800700103